The 2 traits of intelligence American psychologist says people overlook the most
Think about what a "smart person" looks like in your head. Probably articulate. Composed. Someone who always has the right answer and never says anything they'd regret. We've been handed this image so many times, through school, through films, through every LinkedIn post about high performers, that it's become the default.
But psychology keeps quietly dismantling it.
Psychologist Mark Travers, writing in Psychology Today, points to two behaviours that people routinely dismiss or actively judge as signs of low intelligence. Turns out, research suggests the opposite might be true. And once you hear the reasoning, it's hard to unsee.
Most people who mutter to themselves in public are aware of the looks they get. It reads as distracted, forgetful, a little odd. We've all probably caught ourselves doing it and felt mildly embarrassed.
Psychologists Gary Lupyan and Daniel Swingley, as per the article, ran a study in 2012 that changes how you think about this. They gave participants a visual search task to find a specific object among a group of images and split them into two groups. One group spoke the target's name aloud while searching. The other stayed silent. The group that talked found their target significantly faster, consistently, across trials.
Lupyan and Swingley described this as the label feedback hypothesis: verbal labels don't just describe the world, they actively shape how we perceive it. When you say a word out loud, you engage your language production system and your auditory processing system at the same time. The spoken word becomes a perceptual cue that tunes attention and primes the brain for what it's looking for.
So that person muttering "keys, keys, keys" while ransacking their bag? Their brain is actually being quite efficient about it. Self-talk isn't a symptom of disorganisation. It's a tool. And it turns out athletes, surgeons, and chess players use versions of it all the time, they just don't get judged for it the same way.
A 2023 review went further, finding that self-talk plays a role in emotional regulation, planning, task-switching, and higher-order thinking. Which is a fairly long list for something society has spent decades treating as mildly embarrassing.
This one's harder to sell. The assumption about swearing is so baked in that it's the verbal shortcut of people who can't find better words that most of us absorb without questioning it. It feels intuitively right. It's also probably wrong.
Travers cites the work of researchers Kristin and Timothy Jay who studied verbal fluency and found that people who could generate more taboo words also tended to have broader general vocabulary knowledge. The ability to swear well, if you want to put it that way, tracked with language skill not against it.
The reason makes sense when you think about how swear words actually work. They're not filler. They carry emotional weight, social context, and a kind of precision that polished language sometimes can't match. Knowing when to deploy one and which one requires reading a room, understanding register, and having enough command of language to know what ordinary words can and can't do. That's not a poverty of vocabulary. That's fluency.
None of this means constant swearing is a sign of genius. But the old idea that swearing reveals a limited mind? The data doesn't support it. What's interesting is that even when people are shown evidence to the contrary, the stereotype holds. Studies have found that people who swear are still judged as less intelligent and less trustworthy, which says more about the persistence of assumptions than it does about the people being judged.
Why we keep getting intelligence wrong
The problem is a narrow definition that refuses to loosen its grip. We still reach for the same visible markers: academic credentials, quick answers, polished communication, professional achievement. And while those things can reflect intelligence, they're far from the whole picture.
Cognitive ability shows up in problem-solving, memory, adaptability, emotional regulation, and the way a person processes and organises information. Some of the most capable thinkers are messy communicators. Some of the most articulate people in any room are coasting on presentation rather than depth.
Intelligence, as psychology keeps demonstrating, doesn't always look the way we expect. Sometimes it sounds like someone talking to themselves in a supermarket aisle. Sometimes it sounds like a well-timed expletive. And the fact that we're still surprised by that probably says something about us, too.
But psychology keeps quietly dismantling it.
Psychologist Mark Travers, writing in Psychology Today, points to two behaviours that people routinely dismiss or actively judge as signs of low intelligence. Turns out, research suggests the opposite might be true. And once you hear the reasoning, it's hard to unsee.
Talking to yourself
So that person muttering "keys, keys, keys" while ransacking their bag? Their brain is actually being quite efficient about it. Self-talk isn't a symptom of disorganisation. It's a tool. And it turns out athletes, surgeons, and chess players use versions of it all the time, they just don't get judged for it the same way.
Swearing
This one's harder to sell. The assumption about swearing is so baked in that it's the verbal shortcut of people who can't find better words that most of us absorb without questioning it. It feels intuitively right. It's also probably wrong.
Travers cites the work of researchers Kristin and Timothy Jay who studied verbal fluency and found that people who could generate more taboo words also tended to have broader general vocabulary knowledge. The ability to swear well, if you want to put it that way, tracked with language skill not against it.
The reason makes sense when you think about how swear words actually work. They're not filler. They carry emotional weight, social context, and a kind of precision that polished language sometimes can't match. Knowing when to deploy one and which one requires reading a room, understanding register, and having enough command of language to know what ordinary words can and can't do. That's not a poverty of vocabulary. That's fluency.
None of this means constant swearing is a sign of genius. But the old idea that swearing reveals a limited mind? The data doesn't support it. What's interesting is that even when people are shown evidence to the contrary, the stereotype holds. Studies have found that people who swear are still judged as less intelligent and less trustworthy, which says more about the persistence of assumptions than it does about the people being judged.
Why we keep getting intelligence wrong
Cognitive ability shows up in problem-solving, memory, adaptability, emotional regulation, and the way a person processes and organises information. Some of the most capable thinkers are messy communicators. Some of the most articulate people in any room are coasting on presentation rather than depth.
Comments
Be the first to share a thought and become theFirst Voiceof this News Article
end of article
Featured in Etimes
- 'Karuppu' BO day 17: Suriya film registers Sunday growth
- 'Drishyam 3' BO day 11: Mohanlal film sees growth again
- 'Avengers: Doomsday' tickets sell for USD 100,000
- 'Backrooms' shatters records; 'Obsession' scores USD150 million haul
- Kanye West and Travis Scott's concerts BANNED in Italy
- Virat-Anushka's PDA wins the internet as RCB wins IPL 2026
Trending Stories
- 'Panchayat' Season 5 star Chandan Roy aka Vikas decodes Phulera’s next chapter
- Quote of the day by Emily Dickinson: “That it will never come again is what makes life...”
- Bobby Deol on 'heartbreak' of being replaced in 'Jab We Met' made him better
- Meet Rounak Adhikary: Ashneer Grover once told him ‘Tu Baith Jaa Yaar’ and cut off his pitch mid-sentence; now he's living every startup founder's dream
- Quote of the day for kids by Winston Churchill: “The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees...”
- Pakistani journalist DEFENDS depiction of Lyari in 'Dhurandhar': 'Everything shown was TRUE'
- Suriya Gifts Batman-Edition Car: Actor rewards GK Vishnu after 'Karuppu' success
- What is the person who makes pizzas called?
- Quote of the day by Stephen King: “Amateurs sit and wait for inspiration, the rest of us just..."
- Nitin Gadkari unveils ethanol-based stoves: Can it replace LPG stoves?
Photostories
- Cotton vs mulmul: Key differences and which one to choose this summer
- These 5 simple exercises can help women build muscle and boost fitness without a gym
- Morning affirmation at 5 am: Why some people are replacing scrolling with affirmations
- Tears, cheers and fireworks: King Kohli reigns again as RCB defend IPL crown in Ahmedabad
- What happens when you drink coconut water for 15 days daily in summer season and foods to pair with it
- Divyanka Tripathi shares emotional moments from twin boys' birth; Delivery room glimpses to Harshdeep Kaur singing “Chanda Hai Tu” for the newborns
- 'Stranger Things' to 'Game of Thrones': Series that gained popularity owing to their conspiracy theories
- 7 myths about obesity that need to be left behind
- From a Bakrid invite to murder: Inside the Ghaziabad teen stabbing case
- 6 types of litchi available in India and how to pick the sweetest one at the market
Up Next
Follow Us On Social Media