HC quashes Gangsters Act case against ex-SP MP, kin
Lucknow: Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court has granted major relief to former Samajwadi Party MP Rizwan Zaheer and his son-in-law Rameez Nemat by quashing the proceedings initiated against them under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act.
Delivering the judgment, Justice Subhash Vidyarthi held that police and administrative authorities had failed to satisfy the statutory requirements necessary for invoking the Gangsters Act. The court observed that the material available on record did not establish that the alleged activities of the accused had disturbed public order or were committed with the objective of obtaining undue pecuniary or other material benefits.
The order came on an application filed by Rizwan Zaheer and Rameez Nemat under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The HC had reserved its verdict on May 26 and pronounced the judgment on May 29.
The case arose from an FIR registered at Tulsipur police station in Balrampur district under the Gangsters Act. Police had prepared a gang chart describing Rameez Nemat as the gang leader and Rizwan Zaheer as a member. The gang chart was based on two criminal cases — a 2022 case involving allegations of attempt to murder and a 2023 murder case. On this basis, an FIR under the Gangsters Act was lodged and a charge sheet was subsequently filed.
Appearing for the petitioners, senior advocate BA Khan argued that the station house officer had prepared the gang chart on July 7, 2024, whereas the FIR claimed that he first learned about the existence of the alleged gang during police patrolling on July 20, 2024. The HC found this contradiction significant and observed that the narrative in the FIR appeared inherently improbable, indicating mala fide action on the part of the police.
Earlier, opposing the plea, additional government advocate GD Bhatt had contended that the accused wielded such influence and terror in the area that people were reluctant to come forward and lodge complaints against them, and that all procedural requirements under the Gangsters Act had been duly followed.
However, the court held that there was no material on record to show that the alleged acts had affected public tranquillity or disrupted the normal life of the community. It further noted that no substantive material had been produced to establish that the murder case cited in the gang chart was committed for any pecuniary gain.
The court also found that the investigating officer, superintendent of police, district magistrate and the trial court had proceeded mechanically without recording the satisfaction required under the Act and the 2021 Rules. Consequently, the bench quashed the charge sheet, the cognizance order and the summoning order passed by the special judge, bringing the Gangsters Act proceedings against Rizwan Zaheer and Rameez Nemat to an end.
The order came on an application filed by Rizwan Zaheer and Rameez Nemat under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The HC had reserved its verdict on May 26 and pronounced the judgment on May 29.
The case arose from an FIR registered at Tulsipur police station in Balrampur district under the Gangsters Act. Police had prepared a gang chart describing Rameez Nemat as the gang leader and Rizwan Zaheer as a member. The gang chart was based on two criminal cases — a 2022 case involving allegations of attempt to murder and a 2023 murder case. On this basis, an FIR under the Gangsters Act was lodged and a charge sheet was subsequently filed.
Appearing for the petitioners, senior advocate BA Khan argued that the station house officer had prepared the gang chart on July 7, 2024, whereas the FIR claimed that he first learned about the existence of the alleged gang during police patrolling on July 20, 2024. The HC found this contradiction significant and observed that the narrative in the FIR appeared inherently improbable, indicating mala fide action on the part of the police.
Earlier, opposing the plea, additional government advocate GD Bhatt had contended that the accused wielded such influence and terror in the area that people were reluctant to come forward and lodge complaints against them, and that all procedural requirements under the Gangsters Act had been duly followed.
However, the court held that there was no material on record to show that the alleged acts had affected public tranquillity or disrupted the normal life of the community. It further noted that no substantive material had been produced to establish that the murder case cited in the gang chart was committed for any pecuniary gain.
Comments
Be the first to share a thought and become theFirst Voiceof this News Article
end of article
In Lucknow
- Nepal embassy expresses gratitude to UP govt for rescuing 453 nationals in Kushinagar fraud racket
- Union seeks reinstatement of 25k outsourced power employees
- UP surpasses major states in demand-based power supply
- HC quashes Gangsters Act case against ex-SP MP, kin
- HC seeks OBC panel report on panchayat polls
- Mahoba triple murder: Court awards death sentence to man for killing wife, 2 daughters by crushing heads with grinding stone
- Fire department rescues man from electric pole near Lok Bandhu Hospital crossing in Lucknow
Featured In City
- Child brain injury case: HC orders fresh probe after contempt plea against NMC
- Karunanidhi remembered on his 103rd birth anniversary
- Stunned, betrayed: TMC foot soldiers struggle with 31-day bad news cycle
- Police arrest TMC vice-president for illegally occupying house, KMC councillors for extortion
- 28 lakh women get Rs 3,000 each under Annapurna Yojana on day 1
- ‘Shown Rs 149cr profit’, SoBo retiree loses Rs 7cr to online share market fraud
- If I leave a DU course midway, do I get my money back?
Photostories
- 10 rare snakes found in the Amazon rainforest and what travellers should know
- Expert says these 5 toddler behaviours may feel frustrating to parents, but they are completely normal
- Kangana Ranaut skips fast fashion, embraces handloom royalty in Gaurang Shah’s majestic Kanjeevaram saree
- Benefits of Tulsi Mala according to hindu traditions
- 8 metro corridors driving residential growth and transforming India's urban housing landscape
- Green anacondas can do THIS? 10 facts that may surprise you
- Katrina Kaif to Kareena Kapoor Khan: Bollywood actresses who became mothers after 40 and broke stereotypes
- Lalit Modi’s crores-worth London mansion is a 7,000 sq ft cricketing den with signed jerseys, lavish interiors and a private lift
- Uttarakhand's Valley of Flowers is now open for 2026: Everything travellers need to know before visiting
- Love vs ego: 7 powerful differences that can make or break your relationship
Videos
- Firhad Hakim Resigns As Kolkata Mayor, TMC Says Mamata Banerjee ‘Permitted’ Him
06:33 Expelled TMC Leader Ritabrata Banerjee Appointed LoP, Urges Mamata To Be Rebels' 'Chief Advisor'03:09 'Cease Such Attacks': India Condemns Kuwait Airport Attack That Killed Indian Citizen09:30 How A Class 12 Student Traced The CBSE-Coempt Tender Trail And Raised Tough Questions03:05 Mamata's TMC Orders Organisational Reset Amid Growing MLA Revolt Buzz | Watch04:27 The US Just Threatened India With New Tariffs Mid-Negotiation. Here's The Full Story- 21 Dead, 47 Rescued After Massive Fire Engulfs Building In Delhi's Malviya Nagar
12:12 Modi Cabinet Approves ATF Price Stabilisation Fund, Unveils Scheme To Reduce Delhi Air Pollution08:59 Why The 58-MLA Rebel Claim Could Become A Major Test For Mamata Banerjee?
Hot Picks
Top Trends
Up Next
Follow Us On Social Media